At Waterwatch UK, we believe in accountability, transparency, and community-led solutions. Our Water Summits were created to bring together local voices, ensuring that those impacted by water pollution have a genuine say in shaping solutions. However, recent developments have raised concerns about how decisions affecting the future of these summits are being made.
A Working Group Without a Democratic Vote
It has come to our attention that our local MP’s are forming a working group to determine the future stewardship of the Water Summits. While this should be a step forward in strengthening community involvement, the process being proposed lacks one crucial element—democracy.
Rather than an open, community-led election or a structured nomination process that ensures fair representation, the MP’s have instead invited individuals to put themselves forward. This raises concerns about how members will be selected, whose voices will be prioritised, and whether the group will truly represent the broad and diverse range of perspectives within the community.
Who Decides Who Gets a Seat at the Table?
Without clear selection criteria or an independent voting mechanism, there is a real risk that the working group will not be fully representative. This could allow for decisions to be shaped by a select few, rather than through a truly democratic and transparent process that reflects the collective interests of the community.
If the Water Summits are to continue delivering real change, then their leadership and structure must be accountable to the people they serve. The voices of swimmers, paddle boarders, local businesses, environmental groups, and residents must not be overshadowed by a top-down approach.
A Call for Community-Led Governance
Waterwatch UK has long advocated for an independent, community-led model for Water Summits—one that ensures decisions are made fairly and transparently. If a working group is to be formed, it must be structured in a way that guarantees fair representation, rather than being appointed behind closed doors.
We urge decision-makers to embrace an open and democratic process—one that allows the community to vote on who represents them and ensures a balanced representation of stakeholders. Anything less risks undermining the very purpose of the Water Summits and diminishing trust in the process.
MPs Ignoring the Community’s Proposal
In November, Waterwatch UK shared a detailed proposal with MPs outlining a democratic, community-led model for the future of the Water Summits. This proposal was developed through consultation with local stakeholders, ensuring that governance would be fair, transparent, and truly representative.
Instead of working with the community to implement this plan, MPs have chosen to push their own agenda, forming a working group without a democratic vote. This move undermines the inclusive and accountable approach we have been advocating for.
Join Our Open Community Meeting – 4th March
We believe the community deserves a say in how the Water Summits are run. That’s why we are holding an open community meeting on Tuesday, 4th March, to discuss the proposal we shared with MPs in November and to ensure that the future of the Water Summits remains in the hands of the people, not politicians.
???? Date: Tuesday, 4th March
⏰ Time: 19:00
???? Location: Essex Yacht Club
Book your place here.
This is your chance to have your voice heard and to stand up for a fair, transparent process. If you care about the future of our water, we strongly encourage you to attend.
Have Your Say
We want to hear from you. What do you think about the way decisions are being made? Should the working group be elected rather than appointed? Get in touch with us at info@waterwatchuk.org or share your thoughts on our social media channels.
Together, we can push for real change and ensure that community voices are not just heard, but genuinely listened to.
Share this...
Sign up for our newsletter
Statement on Southend MPs Voting Against Amendment 16 to the Water Bill
Reading Time: < 1 minuteWe are deeply disappointed that both of Southend’s MPs, David Burton-Sampson and Bayo Alaba, chose to vote against Amendment 16 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill. This amendment would have ensured that fines imposed on water companies for pollution were reinvested directly into improving water quality, rather than allowing companies to pass the cost onto…
Read MoreUnderstanding CSOs: When Appearances Can Be Deceiving
Reading Time: 2 minutesAt Waterwatch UK, we’re committed to holding all parties accountable when it comes to protecting our water systems. A key part of this mission is ensuring transparency and clarity in reporting Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) activity. Sometimes, what looks like a spill might not be one at all and that’s why accurate monitoring and regular…
Read MoreRising Water Bills and Accountability for Water Companies
Reading Time: 2 minutesAs news circulates that the average water bill in England and Wales will rise by £86 in 2024, many households are facing an added financial burden. These increases are part of a wider plan to fund essential upgrades in water supply infrastructure and to reduce sewage discharges, a critical issue that has drawn increasing scrutiny…
Read MoreUnderstanding Conflicts of Interest: What They Are and Why They Matter
Reading Time: 3 minutesConflicts of interest can arise in various settings, from the corporate world to community organisations. But what exactly is a conflict of interest, and why is it important to address? What Is a Conflict of Interest? A conflict of interest occurs when an individual or organisation has competing interests or loyalties that could influence their…
Read MoreAddressing Concerns: The Truth About Waterwatch UK’s Mission and Costs
Reading Time: 3 minutesThank you to everyone who has shared their thoughts and raised important questions about Waterwatch UK. I welcome this opportunity to address the concerns raised regarding our purpose, structure, and funding needs, and to provide clarity about how we operate and why. 1. Costs Breakdown:While running a few Water Summits a year may seem straightforward…
Read MoreBreaking Down Barriers: My Meeting with Michael Neale from the Environment Agency
Reading Time: 3 minutesOn a rainy day (perfect for a water themed chat!), I had an illuminating meeting with Michael Neale, Team Leader at the Environment Agency, to delve into some of the challenges, misconceptions, and opportunities around water quality and pollution management. As we sat down to discuss everything from permits to pollution, one thing became clear,…
Read More