Waterwatch UK has formally submitted a detailed response to the Independent Water Commission’s national Call for Evidence. Representing the voice of communities, our submission advocates for a water system that is safe, resilient, accountable and rooted in the public interest.
Our top priorities for the future of the water system:
- Water bodies that are safe for swimming and recreation
- Improved water environments with thriving ecosystems
- Greater resilience to climate change
Key reforms we are calling for:
1. Clear roles and accountability
- Government should set long-term, enforceable national outcomes
- Regulators must act independently, enforce standards and be publicly accountable
- Local authorities should coordinate land use, water planning and public education
- Communities must have a formal, funded role in decision making
- Water companies should deliver, not dictate strategy
2. Stronger community voice
- Local Water Summits and Community panels should be embedded into governance
- Community scrutiny must be recognised as a legitimate accountability mechanism
- Engagement should go beyond consultation and include performance review
3. Smarter investment planning
- Water companies must prioritise long-term resilience over short-term cost savings
- Price Review processes should link investment to environmental and public health outcomes
- Maintenance and enhancement must be properly funded and transparently reported
4. Regulatory reform
- Ofwat and the Environment Agency need greater enforcement powers and independence
- Penalties must be stronger and swifter
- Real-time open data should be mandatory
- Citizen-friendly performance dashboards should be published
5. Economic fairness
- Water bills must be fair and linked to real improvements
- Dividends and executive pay should reflect environmental and service performance
- A single social tariff should be introduced across England and Wales
6. Financial and structural accountability
- Overleveraged water companies must face tighter controls
- Investor returns must reflect delivery against public goals
- Complex financial structures must not obscure ownership or reduce transparency
7. Innovation with impact
- New technologies must deliver real public and environmental benefits
- Regulatory ‘sandboxes’ and ringfenced R&D budgets should support innovation
- Citizen-led solutions must be supported alongside corporate investment
8. National strategy, local delivery
- Strategic direction must be enshrined in law and protected from political cycles
- Planning must integrate housing, agriculture, nature and water policy
- Community priorities should shape regional delivery plans
Daniella Boon, Founder of Waterwatch UK, commented:
“Our submission reflects years of lived experience from communities across the UK who feel ignored and let down. This is a moment to reset. The Commission must listen to the public and reimagine the system, not just patch over failure. We’re calling for a water governance model where government leads, regulators enforce, companies deliver, and communities hold everyone to account.”
Waterwatch UK remains committed to building a fairer, cleaner and more democratic water system.
Contact: info@waterwatchuk.org
Share this...
Sign up for our newsletter
Understanding CSOs: When Appearances Can Be Deceiving
Reading Time: 2 minutesAt Waterwatch UK, we’re committed to holding all parties accountable when it comes to protecting our water systems. A key part of this mission is ensuring transparency and clarity in reporting Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) activity. Sometimes, what looks like a spill might not be one at all and that’s why accurate monitoring and regular…
Rising Water Bills and Accountability for Water Companies
Reading Time: 2 minutesAs news circulates that the average water bill in England and Wales will rise by £86 in 2024, many households are facing an added financial burden. These increases are part of a wider plan to fund essential upgrades in water supply infrastructure and to reduce sewage discharges, a critical issue that has drawn increasing scrutiny…
Understanding Conflicts of Interest: What They Are and Why They Matter
Reading Time: 3 minutesConflicts of interest can arise in various settings, from the corporate world to community organisations. But what exactly is a conflict of interest, and why is it important to address? What Is a Conflict of Interest? A conflict of interest occurs when an individual or organisation has competing interests or loyalties that could influence their…
Addressing Concerns: The Truth About Waterwatch UK’s Mission and Costs
Reading Time: 3 minutesThank you to everyone who has shared their thoughts and raised important questions about Waterwatch UK. I welcome this opportunity to address the concerns raised regarding our purpose, structure, and funding needs, and to provide clarity about how we operate and why. 1. Costs Breakdown:While running a few Water Summits a year may seem straightforward…
Breaking Down Barriers: My Meeting with Michael Neale from the Environment Agency
Reading Time: 3 minutesOn a rainy day (perfect for a water themed chat!), I had an illuminating meeting with Michael Neale, Team Leader at the Environment Agency, to delve into some of the challenges, misconceptions, and opportunities around water quality and pollution management. As we sat down to discuss everything from permits to pollution, one thing became clear,…
Proposal for Transitioning Southend Water Quality Summits to a Committee Led Model
Reading Time: 2 minutesIntroduction to the Waterwatch UK Proposal Documents This collection of documents outlines the comprehensive proposal for transitioning the Southend Water Quality Summits to a committee led model, supported by Waterwatch UK. The aim is to establish a governance structure that ensures transparency, accountability, and community representation while maintaining the independence and neutrality that underpin Waterwatch…