Response to Southend Against Sewage’s Feedback on Transitioning the Water Summits to an Independent, Community-Led Model
Thank you, Southend Against Sewage, for sharing your thoughts on our proposal to transition the Water Summits to a community-led, independent model under the governance of Waterwatch UK. Your concerns about ensuring impartiality and independence are essential, and we’d like to address each of your points to clarify our vision and approach.
Firstly, our goal in establishing this community led model is to empower local voices, ensuring that community concerns and perspectives remain at the forefront. We envision a structure where accountability is transparent, and no single entity has undue influence. Waterwatch UK has always championed a fair and balanced approach, and we are committed to maintaining this standard through robust community representation and oversight.
Transparency doesn’t stop with water quality; it extends to how we operate. Waterwatch UK will be funded through contributions from key stakeholders, including local businesses, environmental groups, government bodies, and match funding from Anglian Water. This diverse funding model is critical because it allows us to remain independent while ensuring that all parties contributing to the problem are also part of the solution.
In terms of match funding from Anglian Water, while this would follow a 1:1 structure, it is intended to diversify our funding sources, ensure financial viability, and keep participation fees manageable. Importantly, our governance structure includes safeguards to uphold independence, with strict oversight from a governing board representing varied, independent stakeholders. Transparency will be central to how funds are allocated, with clear boundaries to prevent conflicts of interest.
Waterwatch UK is committed to holding not only water companies to account, but also local authorities, Ofwat, the Environment Agency, ECAS, MPs, the government, the agricultural sector, and anyone else involved in water pollution. These groups understand the need for accountability not just from regulators but from independent entities that represent the communities they impact. By supporting Waterwatch UK, they’re committing to more than just meeting legal obligations; they’re demonstrating a willingness to address the root causes of pollution and work towards long term improvements.
To further support transparency, groups like Southend Against Sewage are welcome to nominate themselves or a representative to stand on the elected governing committee, allowing them to oversee spending directly and witness our commitment to accountability firsthand. Funding will be strictly directed towards essentials, such as securing accessible venues, providing educational resources, and establishing an open customer panel, ensuring public access goes beyond invite only attendees.
We have recently submitted the following documents to David Burton-Sampson and Bayo Alaba for their feedback, with the aim to share with the wider Summit attenndee list soon:
– Proposal for Transitioning Water Quality Summits to an Independent, Community Led Model: Waterwatch UK
– Summary of Board Member Responsibilities
– Governance Options
– Constitution of the Waterwatch UK Regional Southend Community Board
Your point about timing is also crucial. We agree that this transition must be carefully managed, with active involvement from current representatives and public bodies in shaping the model. The engagement of MPs, local government, and community stakeholders remains essential to Waterwatch UK’s mission, and their support will be vital to the Summits’ ongoing success and credibility.
Thank you once again for your feedback. These discussions are invaluable in shaping a fair and representative governance model for the Summits, ensuring they serve as a genuine platform for community engagement, accountability, and change. With Waterwatch UK as an independent body overseeing this process, we are committed to transparency, accountability, and community driven change at the heart of everything we do.
Share this...
Sign up for our newsletter
Statement on Southend MPs Voting Against Amendment 16 to the Water Bill
Reading Time: < 1 minuteWe are deeply disappointed that both of Southend’s MPs, David Burton-Sampson and Bayo Alaba, chose to vote against Amendment 16 to the Water (Special Measures) Bill. This amendment would have ensured that fines imposed on water companies for pollution were reinvested directly into improving water quality, rather than allowing companies to pass the cost onto…
Read MoreUnderstanding CSOs: When Appearances Can Be Deceiving
Reading Time: 2 minutesAt Waterwatch UK, we’re committed to holding all parties accountable when it comes to protecting our water systems. A key part of this mission is ensuring transparency and clarity in reporting Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) activity. Sometimes, what looks like a spill might not be one at all and that’s why accurate monitoring and regular…
Read MoreRising Water Bills and Accountability for Water Companies
Reading Time: 2 minutesAs news circulates that the average water bill in England and Wales will rise by £86 in 2024, many households are facing an added financial burden. These increases are part of a wider plan to fund essential upgrades in water supply infrastructure and to reduce sewage discharges, a critical issue that has drawn increasing scrutiny…
Read MoreUnderstanding Conflicts of Interest: What They Are and Why They Matter
Reading Time: 3 minutesConflicts of interest can arise in various settings, from the corporate world to community organisations. But what exactly is a conflict of interest, and why is it important to address? What Is a Conflict of Interest? A conflict of interest occurs when an individual or organisation has competing interests or loyalties that could influence their…
Read MoreAddressing Concerns: The Truth About Waterwatch UK’s Mission and Costs
Reading Time: 3 minutesThank you to everyone who has shared their thoughts and raised important questions about Waterwatch UK. I welcome this opportunity to address the concerns raised regarding our purpose, structure, and funding needs, and to provide clarity about how we operate and why. 1. Costs Breakdown:While running a few Water Summits a year may seem straightforward…
Read MoreBreaking Down Barriers: My Meeting with Michael Neale from the Environment Agency
Reading Time: 3 minutesOn a rainy day (perfect for a water themed chat!), I had an illuminating meeting with Michael Neale, Team Leader at the Environment Agency, to delve into some of the challenges, misconceptions, and opportunities around water quality and pollution management. As we sat down to discuss everything from permits to pollution, one thing became clear,…
Read More